(image TRUTH)
( truth (lol) | raw text )
(image TRUTH)
( truth (lol) | raw text )
That’s going to be a crippling talking point, regardless of whether it’s true. Presumably it’s like 90% bullshit.
Edit: I assume a big part of the bullshit is that Boomer retirees skew native born.
Taylor Budowich: “At the end of it all, President Trump delivered his most disciplined, clever and devastatingly precise debate performance yet. There’s no Democrat waiting in the wings who could have stood in Mr. Biden’s place on that stage Thursday and measured up to Mr. Trump. So, regardless of the Democrats’ choice in a lose-lose proposition, it’s Mr. Trump’s message of prosperity and American greatness that will ultimately be decisive in November.” https://www. wsj.com/articles/sorry-democra ts-biden-is-your-man-presidential-debate-2146aaa4
( truth (lol) | raw text )
“These have been the worst four days for the Democratic Party since Lee surrendered at Appomattox.” -Unnamed Democratic Operative
( truth (lol) | raw text )
This will end!
( truth (lol) | raw text )
Joy Reid on MSNBC, perhaps the most pro-Biden, anti-Trump person on cable news, said this: “My phone never really stopped buzzing throughout. The universal reaction was … approaching panic!”
( truth (lol) | raw text )
Van Jones on CNN: “He didn’t do well at all … there’s time for this party to figure out a different way forward.”
( truth (lol) | raw text )
that’s what it is, mixed with people having less babies
realDonaldTrump:
Literally conservatives made up fake signs, put them up, posted them on social media all WTF IS THIS??? THE GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS THEFT!
… and it worked, and now it’s a thing.
Unfortunately it doesn’t matter, it’s going to be a highly effective talking point… and if Joe can’t give a coherent argument about why his policies are better and how this is bullshit, it’s even worse.
The Drudge Report, which has become vehemently anti-Trump, even had this as its siren headlines:
OPERATION: REPLACE BIDEN DEMS SCRAMBLE WITH 130 DAYS TO GO! DEBATE CATASTROPHE.
( truth (lol) | raw text )
Politico: “Biden Is Toast.”
( truth (lol) | raw text )
I got the price of Insulin for seniors brought WAY DOWN, not Biden. He just inherited this, and many other things, and then always tries to take credit for it. He’s done nothing but destroy our Country!!!
( truth (lol) | raw text )
Big Rally tomorrow night at TRUMP NATIONAL DORAL, MIAMI. Big crowd expected. Be there, will be AMAZING!
( truth (lol) | raw text )
Will be Interviewed tonight by the great Sean Hannity — 9 P.M. FoxNews. So much to talk about. ENJOY!
( truth (lol) | raw text )
….“It is important to remember that a gag order is a prior restraint on speech. The First Amendment prohibits prior restraints except in the most extraordinary circumstances, in which important countervailing interests are at stake. In New York Times Co. v. U.S. (1971), the Pentagon Papers case, the Supreme Court rejected such claims by the government and allowed the media to publish sensitive classified information…The marketplace of ideas shouldn’t allow one candidate to take unfair advantage of a questionable conviction while the other candidate has one hand tied behind his back by a questionable gag order. Voters who haven’t yet made up their minds, and who might be influenced by what both Messrs. Biden and Trump have to say about the fairness of the conviction, should consider filing friend-of-the-court briefs so that the justices can consider their interests as well as Mr. Trump’s…The politicization of the courts poses a threat to due process and the rule of law.”
( truth (lol) | raw text )
Alan Dershowitz: “The Trump Gag Order Violates Your Freedom of Speech: Mr. Trump isn’t the only victim of this ill-advised gag order. It violates your First Amendment rights and mine as well. The First Amendment, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, provides that no government agency can abridge the freedom of speech. This important freedom has two parts. The first is the right of the speaker to express his views. The second, less obvious but equally important, is the right of the public to hear the speaker’s views and evaluate them. Justice Thurgood Marshall summarized Supreme Court case law on this subject in Stanley v. Georgia (1969): ‘It is now well established that the Constitution protects the right to receive information and ideas’…Just as no one is above the law, no one is above criticism regarding the legal process. In the marketplace of ideas protected by the First Amendment, all of us—not the New York courts—have a right to judge him on what he says.”….
( truth (lol) | raw text )