Joke’s on her, he’s not going to elevate her. He never repays loyalty and is probably embarrassed/emasculated by her being his judge.
SHOCKING LEGAL EXPERTS
And literally no one else. Lol law.
As ridiculous as this sounds, this SCOTUS has given Trump no reason not to shoot his shot with them at every opportunity
1 Like
What does the SC have to do with a state conviction
Supreme Court said that Trump’s absolute immunity extends to even introducing evidence of official acts undertaken while in office at a criminal prosecution. Some of the evidence introduced during the Manhattan case was Trump signing checks while he was in office, conversations he had with some of the witnesses while he was in office, etc.
With inside the box thinking like that, you’ll never be a conservative SCOTUS justice.
4 Likes
Chief Justin Aileen concurs.
really this is the thing, roberts and alito and thomas should all be wondering why trump will bother keeping any of them around. when he starts rounding up the bidens and AOC and whoever else why wouldn’t he send these three bozos to gitmo to make room for his own cronies on the bench
You have a point about Roberts, but Trump probably likes Alito and Thomas more than the 3 he nominated.
oh I don’t think he has any issues with anything they’ve done so far, but they still aren’t “his guys”
Welp
——-
Manhattan prosecutors on Tuesday agreed with Donald J. Trump’s request to postpone his criminal sentencing so that the judge overseeing the case could weigh whether a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling might imperil his conviction, new court filings show.
It is up to the judge to determine whether to postpone the sentencing, though with both sides in agreement, it seems likely he would do so.
ahahahahaha four years after Trump blatantly tries to steal an election and we’re still not even sure if that was a crime or not, greatest democracy the world has ever seen.
How long could it possibly take to weigh that? He wasn’t President when he committed the crimes, wgaf if there’s now a SCOTUS ruling that he can commit all the crimes he wants as POTUS?
Parts of his “official acts” were used in his trial though
Ah! Well. Nevertheless,
I think the issue is that he wrote one of the reimbursement checks after inauguration which seems like a pretty dumb nitpicky point (not sure if writing a check from a personal account might be an official act, who can tell???)
Hahahaha imagine having to try to teach this shit in an lol law school
Gotta be a mistrial and double jeopardy is attached, oh well nevertheless.
Future presidents are going to love this one cool trick!
Future presidents just need to pay off their illegal stuff using illegally rewarded official government contracts. EZ game!
Law schools probably won’t exist.
1 Like