Those numbers are irrelevant. There is no logic other than fuck you we are the SEC
Just take the gift.
Really not too different. Either a bunch of computer algorithms or 13 people. Someone is going to be butthurt. 5 into 4 was always going to give this result.
dude I am not trying to justify anything, it’s just data
lulz
It is amazing that after all these years sometimes I still have to check if this stuff is real.
Let’s say Bama was 13-0 but looked like trash in every game. Hypothetical
FSU lost to LSU week one 24-23
FSU rolls every other team like 42-3
At year end you have UW UT UM all 13-0 with Bama 13-0
Your data shows FSU is 1.
Still. Irrelevant
It’s a game, the whole thing is irrelevant
Updated FEI expected losses (rank) for an elite team:
Washington 2.20 (2)
Alabama 1.95 (6)
Texas 1.38 (31)
Michigan 1.30 (36)
Georgia 1.07 (47)
FSU 0.91 (60)
FSU slappies: “We all basically played the same schedule here, guys.”
No one is saying Michigan should be out because our LOL schedule. We played 1.5 real teams
Should Georgia jump Washington because the PAC 12 is trash?
Texas is in at 12-1 and the big 12 is trash
This all goes back to what I said to CN two days ago. It will defy logic but SEC is in
There is no metric y’all can come up with that makes
13-0 less valuable than 12-1
Sorry.
Of course there is. I just posted it. You simply don’t understand it or don’t want to (it’s obviously the latter).
If Bama was 13-0 and lower on that list and got left out
You wouldn’t be posting that list
That’s the point
It’s all just making shit up to justify not leaving the SEC out
No 13-0 p5 champ has been left out
What the committee is saying is the ACC is the WAC now
Yeah sure invent a counterfactual where an SEC team runs the table and has the worst SOS of the viable playoff contenders. If you replace Texas with a cupcake, they’re 13-0 and still have the #2 SOS and are obviously a stone cold lock.
Things look awfully bad for OSU right now. Lots of people portalling out, hard to see them upgrading on McCord in the portal too
Your numbers say a one loss Washington should get in ahead of an undefeated Georgia
That’s dumb
I’m sure the committee would do just that
So f stupid
They’re Frameau’s numbers and they don’t “say” anything other than what the expected number losses are for an elite team having played that schedule.
You’re the one using them to make an argument. I’m using the same argument as you to rank a 12-1 Washington over Georgia. That’s how good your argument is
Maybe the real story here is that fraud Bama got in would have gotten in over 12-1 UW!