She’s the same one who recently got into an edit war on her own Wikipedia entry because she’s mad that it (correctly) points out she compared COVID restrictions to WW2 Japanese internment camps.
She is very, very mad to now be in the minority. Please don’t put in the newspaper that she got mad.
Who knows if this is a first step toward something meaningful, or “LOL another sternly-worded letter”?
NB: I’m not familiar with this source, so if it’s garbage I apologize. Also, “Whitehouse” does not equal “White House,” which would have been more interesting, IMO.
Why did Alabama choose first to defy the district court, and then to file an appeal with so little substance? It seems pretty obvious: Alabama thinks it will win if the case goes back to the Supreme Court, because the Supreme Court is full of right-wing hacks. Again, it is not liberals who are operating on this belief. It is not left-wing trolls on social media. It is the Republicans governing the state of Alabama. The conservative legal movement spent decades building this Supreme Court majority, the GOP expects more returns on its investment.
All of this shows that critics of the Supreme Court majority are not alone in believing that it includes a bunch of partisan hacks. The majority’s political allies think so too. They just happen to like it. If the justices truly deplore this impression, they might spend a little time asking themselves what they’ve done to create such a commonly shared consensus.
Also, here’s a very astute piece from MJS + Lithwick that puts Alabama’s defiance of the Milligan ruling in historical context, highlighting how deranged the conservative relationship with the law has become: